top of page
Imagination Station
Reflecting on My Visit to Thomas Jefferson School
As I embarked on this reflective visit to Thomas Jefferson School, where I have served as Director of Development for over three years, I approached the experience with a sense of curiosity and openness. This was a chance to step back from my daily responsibilities and reexamine the institution through fresh eyes. My central question was, How does the school’s commitment to its mission align with its practices, particularly in the context of ethical decision-making and its approach to student character development?
The Visit: Faculty Meeting Observations
I chose to attend an all-faculty meeting at the end of the semester. The setting was casual, with snacks and drinks creating a welcoming atmosphere. Faculty sat in a circle, promoting inclusivity and open dialogue. However, I noticed the absence of any formal bonding activity or check-in that might have further deepened connections among faculty members.
The meeting quickly moved into serious discussions about student disciplinary actions and academic progress. These conversations revolved around two key cases: a student caught cheating and another student struggling with ADHD and executive function issues. Observing these discussions, I was struck by the school’s deep engagement with ethical questions. Faculty members grappled with the balance between maintaining academic integrity and supporting students in crisis. The deliberations reminded me of the principles we explored in my Ethics and Education course, particularly those related to deontology, virtue ethics, and consequentialism.
Key Learnings and Reflections
1. Ethics in Action
The discussion about the student caught cheating illuminated the ethical complexity faculty members face. Faculty debated the severity of the infraction, its impact on the student’s future, and the institution’s role in shaping character. These conversations touched on deontological ethics—what duty the institution has to uphold rules—and virtue ethics—how to balance consequences with the need to nurture students as ethical individuals. It reminded me of Immanuel Kant’s concept of the categorical imperative: making decisions that could be universalized while still considering the humanity of the individual.
2. Mission vs. Reality
The case of the student with ADHD raised critical questions about the alignment between the school’s mission and its capabilities. The faculty explored whether the school could adequately support this student while upholding its academic expectations and institutional reputation. This sparked discussions about the term “mission-appropriate” and whether it should evolve to “value-aligned.” What resonated most was the Head of School’s willingness to examine the systemic and historical factors that contributed to these challenges, including the enrollment process and the resources available for students with diverse needs.
3. Building Empathy Through Systemic Awareness
A recurring theme was the school’s struggle to balance empathy for individual students with the equitable allocation of resources. Faculty questioned whether supporting one struggling student might inadvertently detract from the broader needs of the student body. Yet, I observed a collective commitment to understanding each student’s unique circumstances, with the school counselor playing a vital role in providing holistic insights. This reinforced my belief that empathy is not just an individual trait but a systemic practice that must be embedded in institutional structures.
Reflections on My Approach
When designing this visit, I aimed to practice “sensemaking”—a process of observing and interpreting the complex dynamics at play within the institution. I intentionally chose a setting where ethical dilemmas and institutional values would surface naturally. By listening closely to faculty discussions, I could identify tensions and opportunities that might not have been visible from my usual vantage point as a development professional.
This exercise also prompted me to confront my own biases and past frustrations. Having started at the school during a period of turbulence, I initially viewed its resistance to change as stagnation. However, this visit challenged that narrative. I now see a school that is striving to stabilize and align its actions with its mission, even if progress feels slow.
Closing Thoughts
My visit underscored the profound ethical responsibility that schools hold in shaping the lives of their students. At Thomas Jefferson School, I witnessed a community grappling with the tension between intention and consequence, between the values of the institution and the realities of its students. These reflections have deepened my appreciation for the complexities of educational leadership and the importance of aligning mission, values, and actions.
As I move forward in my role, I am inspired to think about how I can contribute to this alignment—not only by fostering a culture of philanthropy but also by supporting initiatives that build empathy, trust, and shared purpose across the institution.
bottom of page